[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e416909-21bd-92f6-816d-695d8eaa16aa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:14:57 +0200
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mlxsw@...lanox.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/11] ipmr, ip6mr: Unite creation of new
mr_table
On 27/02/18 20:58, Yuval Mintz wrote:
> Now that both ipmr and ip6mr are using the same mr_table structure,
> we can have a common function to allocate & initialize a new instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@...lanox.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mroute_base.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
> net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/ipv6/ip6mr.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
> 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
I don't like the function definition broken with the name and type on different rows, but
I guess it's a personal preference, the patch looks okay.
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists