lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1519835960.30253.3.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:39:20 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net] test_bpf: reduce MAX_TESTRUNS

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

For tests that are using the maximal number of BPF instruction, each
run takes 20 usec. Looping 10,000 times on them totals 200 ms, which
is bad when the loop is not preemptible.

test_bpf: #264 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:1 19248
18548 PASS
test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:1 20896 PASS

Lets divide by ten the number of iterations, so that max latency is
20ms. We could use need_resched() to break the loop earlier if we
believe 20 ms is too much.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index b4e22345963f339ffe05c974bc111ae7da9dc58f..d8dc618b223bb5168b0c7e9d9f4316eef3fbfa34 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 
 /* General test specific settings */
 #define MAX_SUBTESTS	3
-#define MAX_TESTRUNS	10000
+#define MAX_TESTRUNS	1000
 #define MAX_DATA	128
 #define MAX_INSNS	512
 #define MAX_K		0xffffFFFF

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ