[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d72361e-e8a7-38e0-16db-ade3f658ce92@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:57:58 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Tushar Dave <tushar.n.dave@...cle.com>, ast@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-selftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_probe_read_str to bpf_helpers.h
Hi Tushar,
On 02/28/2018 01:33 AM, Tushar Dave wrote:
> Using bpf_probe_read_str() from samples/bpf causes compiler warning.
> e.g.
> warning: implicit declaration of function 'bpf_probe_read_str' is invalid in C99
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> num = bpf_probe_read_str(buf, sizeof(buf), ctx->di);
> ^
> 1 warning generated.
>
> Add bpf_probe_read_str() to bpf_helpers.h so it can be used by
> samples/bpf programs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Dave <tushar.n.dave@...cle.com>
In general no objections to it, but it would need an in-tree
user first:
$ git grep -n bpf_probe_read_str tools/
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:596: * int bpf_probe_read_str(void *dst, int size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
$
Why not adding this along with a sample?
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists