[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180228.223217.1178910703084049513.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:32:17 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sthemmin@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: add bound ports statistic
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:28:02 -0800
> How useful it is to report this information ?
>
> Given REUSEADDR and REUSEPORT, I really wonder what can be derived from
> this counter.
>
> It seems its semantic is weak.
To me none of this really matters.
What matters is that iproute2 reported this via slabinfo for longer
than a decade.
It broke recently when SLAB started merging caches just like SLUB
always did.
So alternative to Stephen's patch is turning off SLAB cache merging
for certain networking caches, which is definitely a non-starter.
I have directed Stephen to handle the situation in this way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists