[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180304.184406.446255603611101639.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 18:44:06 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: g.nault@...halink.fr
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nuclearcat@...learcat.com, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ppp: prevent unregistered channels from connecting
to PPP units
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 18:41:16 +0100
> PPP units don't hold any reference on the channels connected to it.
> It is the channel's responsibility to ensure that it disconnects from
> its unit before being destroyed.
> In practice, this is ensured by ppp_unregister_channel() disconnecting
> the channel from the unit before dropping a reference on the channel.
>
> However, it is possible for an unregistered channel to connect to a PPP
> unit: register a channel with ppp_register_net_channel(), attach a
> /dev/ppp file to it with ioctl(PPPIOCATTCHAN), unregister the channel
> with ppp_unregister_channel() and finally connect the /dev/ppp file to
> a PPP unit with ioctl(PPPIOCCONNECT).
>
> Once in this situation, the channel is only held by the /dev/ppp file,
> which can be released at anytime and free the channel without letting
> the parent PPP unit know. Then the ppp structure ends up with dangling
> pointers in its ->channels list.
>
> Prevent this scenario by forbidding unregistered channels from
> connecting to PPP units. This maintains the code logic by keeping
> ppp_unregister_channel() responsible from disconnecting the channel if
> necessary and avoids modification on the reference counting mechanism.
>
> This issue seems to predate git history (successfully reproduced on
> Linux 2.6.26 and earlier PPP commits are unrelated).
>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists