netdev - Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: unlock xt_table earlier in __do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180305221053.ww7y24xzaanmmwlc@salvia>
Date:   Mon, 5 Mar 2018 23:10:53 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: unlock xt_table earlier in __do_replace

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:25:56PM +0100, Xin Long wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> > Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
> >> Besides, all xt_target/match checkentry is called out of xt_table
> >> lock. It's better also to move all cleanup_entry calling out of
> >> xt_table lock, just as do_replace_finish does for ebtables.
> >
> > Agree but I don't see how this patch fixes a bug so I would prefer if
> > this could simmer in nf-next first.
>
> Sure. No bug fix, it's an improvement.

Applied to nf-next, thanks.