[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1cee1792-52ae-f408-15f0-ee42c1fb2ea3@mellanox.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 12:09:48 +0200
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
To: Sarah Newman <srn@...mr.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_en: fix potential use-after-free with
dma_unmap_page
On 05/03/2018 6:20 AM, Sarah Newman wrote:
> Take an additional reference to a page whenever it is placed
> into the rx ring and put the page again after running
> dma_unmap_page.
>
> When swiotlb is in use, calling dma_unmap_page means that
> the original page mapped with dma_map_page must still be valid,
> as swiotlb will copy data from its internal cache back to the
> originally requested DMA location.
>
> When GRO is enabled, before this patch all references to the
> original frag may be put and the page freed before dma_unmap_page
> in mlx4_en_free_frag is called.
>
> It is possible there is a path where the use-after-free occurs
> even with GRO disabled, but this has not been observed so far.
>
> The bug can be trivially detected by doing the following:
>
> * Compile the kernel with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> * Run the kernel as a Xen Dom0
> * Leave GRO enabled on the interface
> * Run a 10 second or more test with iperf over the interface.
>
Hi Sarah, thanks for your patch!
> This bug was likely introduced in
> commit 4cce66cdd14a ("mlx4_en: map entire pages to increase throughput"),
> first part of u3.6.
>
> It was incidentally fixed in
> commit 34db548bfb95 ("mlx4: add page recycling in receive path"),
> first part of v4.12.
>
> This version applies to the v4.9 series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sarah Newman <srn@...mr.com>
> Tested-by: Sarah Newman <srn@...mr.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> index bcbb80f..d1fb087 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> @@ -80,10 +80,14 @@ static int mlx4_alloc_pages(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
> page_alloc->page = page;
> page_alloc->dma = dma;
> page_alloc->page_offset = 0;
> + page_alloc->page_owner = true;
Do we really need this boolean? I believe the issue can be fixed without
it. We need to make sure we hold the correct refcnt at every stage, and
maintain symmetry between a flow and its inverse.
Upon alloc, refcnt is 1. This alloc refcnt should be inverted by a call
to put_page. We might want to introduce a page free API (symmetric to
mlx4_alloc_pages), that does: dma unmap the page, call put_page, nullify
pointer.
Once alloced, page refcnt is bumped up by the amount of possible frags
populating it, which is (page_size / frag_stride), as you do here.
> /* Not doing get_page() for each frag is a big win
> * on asymetric workloads. Note we can not use atomic_set().
> */
> - page_ref_add(page, page_alloc->page_size / frag_info->frag_stride - 1);
> + /* Since the page must be valid until after dma_unmap_page is called,
> + * take an additional reference we would not have otherwise.
> + */
> + page_ref_add(page, page_alloc->page_size / frag_info->frag_stride);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -105,9 +109,13 @@ static int mlx4_en_alloc_frags(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
> page_alloc[i].page_offset += frag_info->frag_stride;
>
> if (page_alloc[i].page_offset + frag_info->frag_stride <=
> - ring_alloc[i].page_size)
> - continue;
> -
> + ring_alloc[i].page_size) {
> + WARN_ON(!page_alloc[i].page);
> + WARN_ON(!page_alloc[i].page_owner);
Why WARN before the likely() check?
Move after the check, for a better performance.
> + if (likely(page_alloc[i].page &&
> + page_alloc[i].page_owner))
> + continue;
> + }
> if (unlikely(mlx4_alloc_pages(priv, &page_alloc[i],
> frag_info, gfp)))
> goto out;
> @@ -131,7 +139,7 @@ static int mlx4_en_alloc_frags(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
> page = page_alloc[i].page;
> /* Revert changes done by mlx4_alloc_pages */
> page_ref_sub(page, page_alloc[i].page_size /
> - priv->frag_info[i].frag_stride - 1);
> + priv->frag_info[i].frag_stride);
> put_page(page);
> }
> }
> @@ -146,11 +154,13 @@ static void mlx4_en_free_frag(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
> u32 next_frag_end = frags[i].page_offset + 2 * frag_info->frag_stride;
>
>
> - if (next_frag_end > frags[i].page_size)
> + if (next_frag_end > frags[i].page_size) {
> dma_unmap_page(priv->ddev, frags[i].dma, frags[i].page_size,
> frag_info->dma_dir);
> + put_page(frags[i].page);
> + }
>
> - if (frags[i].page)
> + if (frags[i].page_owner)
> put_page(frags[i].page);
> }
>
> @@ -184,9 +194,10 @@ static int mlx4_en_init_allocator(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
> page = page_alloc->page;
> /* Revert changes done by mlx4_alloc_pages */
> page_ref_sub(page, page_alloc->page_size /
> - priv->frag_info[i].frag_stride - 1);
> + priv->frag_info[i].frag_stride);
> put_page(page);
> page_alloc->page = NULL;
> + page_alloc->page_owner = false;
> }
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> @@ -206,12 +217,14 @@ static void mlx4_en_destroy_allocator(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
>
> dma_unmap_page(priv->ddev, page_alloc->dma,
> page_alloc->page_size, frag_info->dma_dir);
> + put_page(page_alloc->page);
for symmetry, i'd move this after the while loop.
> while (page_alloc->page_offset + frag_info->frag_stride <
> page_alloc->page_size) {
> put_page(page_alloc->page);
> page_alloc->page_offset += frag_info->frag_stride;
> }
> page_alloc->page = NULL;
> + page_alloc->page_owner = false;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -251,6 +264,11 @@ static int mlx4_en_prepare_rx_desc(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
> if (ring->page_cache.index > 0) {
> frags[0] = ring->page_cache.buf[--ring->page_cache.index];
> rx_desc->data[0].addr = cpu_to_be64(frags[0].dma);
> + WARN_ON(frags[0].page_owner);
> + if (likely(!frags[0].page_owner)) {
> + page_ref_inc(frags[0].page);
> + frags[0].page_owner = true;
> + }
Why? If I'm not mistaken, the page is cached with refcnt == 2. No?
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -569,6 +587,7 @@ void mlx4_en_deactivate_rx_ring(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
>
> dma_unmap_page(priv->ddev, frame->dma, frame->page_size,
> priv->frag_info[0].dma_dir);
> + WARN_ON(frame->page_owner);
> put_page(frame->page);
> }
> ring->page_cache.index = 0;
> @@ -595,7 +614,7 @@ static int mlx4_en_complete_rx_desc(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
> frag_info = &priv->frag_info[nr];
> if (length <= frag_info->frag_prefix_size)
> break;
> - if (unlikely(!frags[nr].page))
> + if (unlikely(!frags[nr].page_owner))
> goto fail;
>
> dma = be64_to_cpu(rx_desc->data[nr].addr);
> @@ -607,7 +626,7 @@ static int mlx4_en_complete_rx_desc(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
> skb_frag_size_set(&skb_frags_rx[nr], frag_info->frag_size);
> skb_frags_rx[nr].page_offset = frags[nr].page_offset;
> skb->truesize += frag_info->frag_stride;
> - frags[nr].page = NULL;
> + frags[nr].page_owner = false;
> }
> /* Adjust size of last fragment to match actual length */
> if (nr > 0)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c
> index e2509bb..25f7f9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c
> @@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ u32 mlx4_en_recycle_tx_desc(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
> .dma = tx_info->map0_dma,
> .page_offset = 0,
> .page_size = PAGE_SIZE,
> + .page_owner = false,
I don't understand why this is needed.
> };
>
> if (!mlx4_en_rx_recycle(ring->recycle_ring, &frame)) {
> @@ -1128,7 +1129,7 @@ netdev_tx_t mlx4_en_xmit_frame(struct mlx4_en_rx_alloc *frame,
> dma = frame->dma;
>
> tx_info->page = frame->page;
> - frame->page = NULL;
> + frame->page_owner = false;
> tx_info->map0_dma = dma;
> tx_info->map0_byte_count = length;
> tx_info->nr_txbb = nr_txbb;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h
> index df0f396..2c9d9a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h
> @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ struct mlx4_en_rx_alloc {
> dma_addr_t dma;
> u32 page_offset;
> u32 page_size;
> + bool page_owner;
> };
>
> #define MLX4_EN_CACHE_SIZE (2 * NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT)
>
Thanks,
Tariq
Powered by blists - more mailing lists