[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152024953553.3454.6570690260452792825.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 14:32:15 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, fw@...len.de,
stephen@...workplumber.org, davem@...emloft.net,
dmitry.tarnyagin@...kless.no, socketcan@...tkopp.net,
mkl@...gutronix.de, gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
johannes.berg@...el.com, garsilva@...eddedor.com,
ross.lagerwall@...rix.com, aconole@...heb.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 11/12] net: Convert ctnetlink_net_ops
These pernet_operations register and unregister
two conntrack notifiers, and they seem to be safe
to be executed in parallel.
General/not related to async pernet_operations JFI:
ctnetlink_net_exit_batch() actions are grouped in batch,
and this could look like there is synchronize_rcu()
is forgotten. But there is synchronize_rcu() on module
exit patch (in ctnetlink_exit()), so this batch may
be reworked as simple .exit method.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index dd177ebee9aa..8884d302d33a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -3417,6 +3417,7 @@ static void __net_exit ctnetlink_net_exit_batch(struct list_head *net_exit_list)
static struct pernet_operations ctnetlink_net_ops = {
.init = ctnetlink_net_init,
.exit_batch = ctnetlink_net_exit_batch,
+ .async = true,
};
static int __init ctnetlink_init(void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists