| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20180306144509.108767-1-sbrivio@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 15:45:09 +0100
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] selftests: net: Introduce first PMTU test
One single test implemented so far: test_pmtu_vti6_exception
checks that the PMTU of a route exception, caused by a tunnel
exceeding the link layer MTU, is affected by administrative
changes of the tunnel MTU. Creation of the route exception is
checked too.
Requested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
---
v2: Fix error handling for setup_*() functions, make 'ip route get' output
parsing more robust, sleep after configuring vti6 addresses (all issues
reported by David Ahern)
tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
index 229a038966e3..785fc18a16b4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ CFLAGS = -Wall -Wl,--no-as-needed -O2 -g
CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include/
TEST_PROGS := run_netsocktests run_afpackettests test_bpf.sh netdevice.sh rtnetlink.sh
-TEST_PROGS += fib_tests.sh fib-onlink-tests.sh
+TEST_PROGS += fib_tests.sh fib-onlink-tests.sh pmtu.sh
TEST_GEN_FILES = socket
TEST_GEN_FILES += psock_fanout psock_tpacket msg_zerocopy
TEST_GEN_PROGS = reuseport_bpf reuseport_bpf_cpu reuseport_bpf_numa
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..4f12f84630e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# Check that route PMTU values match expectations
+#
+# Tests currently implemented:
+#
+# - test_pmtu_vti6_exception
+# Set up vti6 tunnel on top of veth, with xfrm states and policies, in two
+# namespaces with matching endpoints. Check that route exception is
+# created by exceeding link layer MTU with ping to other endpoint. Then
+# decrease and increase MTU of tunnel, checking that route exception PMTU
+# changes accordingly
+
+NS_A="ns-$(mktemp -u XXXXXX)"
+NS_B="ns-$(mktemp -u XXXXXX)"
+ns_a="ip netns exec ${NS_A}"
+ns_b="ip netns exec ${NS_B}"
+
+veth6_a_addr="fd00:1::a"
+veth6_b_addr="fd00:1::b"
+veth6_mask="64"
+
+vti6_a_addr="fd00:2::a"
+vti6_b_addr="fd00:2::b"
+vti6_mask="64"
+
+setup_namespaces() {
+ ip netns add ${NS_A} || return 0
+ ip netns add ${NS_B}
+
+ return 1
+}
+
+setup_veth() {
+ ${ns_a} ip link add veth_a type veth peer name veth_b || return 0
+ ${ns_a} ip link set veth_b netns ${NS_B}
+
+ ${ns_a} ip addr add ${veth6_a_addr}/${veth6_mask} dev veth_a
+ ${ns_b} ip addr add ${veth6_b_addr}/${veth6_mask} dev veth_b
+
+ ${ns_a} ip link set veth_a up
+ ${ns_b} ip link set veth_b up
+
+ return 1
+}
+
+setup_vti6() {
+ ${ns_a} ip link add vti_a type vti6 local ${veth6_a_addr} remote ${veth6_b_addr} key 10 || return 0
+ ${ns_b} ip link add vti_b type vti6 local ${veth6_b_addr} remote ${veth6_a_addr} key 10
+
+ ${ns_a} ip addr add ${vti6_a_addr}/${vti6_mask} dev vti_a
+ ${ns_b} ip addr add ${vti6_b_addr}/${vti6_mask} dev vti_b
+
+ ${ns_a} ip link set vti_a up
+ ${ns_b} ip link set vti_b up
+
+ sleep 1
+
+ return 1
+}
+
+setup_xfrm() {
+ ${ns_a} ip -6 xfrm state add src ${veth6_a_addr} dst ${veth6_b_addr} spi 0x1000 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel || return 0
+ ${ns_a} ip -6 xfrm state add src ${veth6_b_addr} dst ${veth6_a_addr} spi 0x1001 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel
+ ${ns_a} ip -6 xfrm policy add dir out mark 10 tmpl src ${veth6_a_addr} dst ${veth6_b_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
+ ${ns_a} ip -6 xfrm policy add dir in mark 10 tmpl src ${veth6_b_addr} dst ${veth6_a_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
+
+ ${ns_b} ip -6 xfrm state add src ${veth6_a_addr} dst ${veth6_b_addr} spi 0x1000 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel
+ ${ns_b} ip -6 xfrm state add src ${veth6_b_addr} dst ${veth6_a_addr} spi 0x1001 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel
+ ${ns_b} ip -6 xfrm policy add dir out mark 10 tmpl src ${veth6_b_addr} dst ${veth6_a_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
+ ${ns_b} ip -6 xfrm policy add dir in mark 10 tmpl src ${veth6_a_addr} dst ${veth6_b_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
+
+ return 1
+}
+
+setup() {
+ tunnel_type="$1"
+
+ [ "$(id -u)" -ne 0 ] && echo "SKIP: need to run as root" && exit 0
+
+ setup_namespaces && echo "SKIP: namespaces not supported" && exit 0
+ setup_veth && echo "SKIP: veth not supported" && exit 0
+
+ case ${tunnel_type} in
+ "vti6")
+ setup_vti6 && echo "SKIP: vti6 not supported" && exit 0
+ setup_xfrm && echo "SKIP: xfrm not supported" && exit 0
+ ;;
+ *)
+ ;;
+ esac
+}
+
+cleanup() {
+ ip netns del ${NS_A} 2 > /dev/null
+ ip netns del ${NS_B} 2 > /dev/null
+}
+
+mtu() {
+ ns_cmd="${1}"
+ dev="${2}"
+ mtu="${3}"
+
+ ${ns_cmd} ip link set dev ${dev} mtu ${mtu}
+}
+
+route_get_dst_exception() {
+ dst="${1}"
+
+ ${ns_a} ip route get "${dst}"
+}
+
+route_get_dst_pmtu_from_exception() {
+ dst="${1}"
+
+ exception="$(route_get_dst_exception ${dst})"
+ next=0
+ for i in ${exception}; do
+ [ ${next} -eq 1 ] && echo "${i}" && return
+ [ "${i}" = "mtu" ] && next=1
+ done
+}
+
+test_pmtu_vti6_exception() {
+ setup vti6
+
+ # Create route exception by exceeding link layer MTU
+ mtu "${ns_a}" vti_a 5000
+ mtu "${ns_b}" vti_b 5000
+ ${ns_a} ping6 -q -i 0.1 -w 2 -s 60000 ${vti6_b_addr} > /dev/null
+
+ # Check that exception was created
+ if [ "$(route_get_dst_pmtu_from_exception ${vti6_b_addr})" = "" ]; then
+ echo "FAIL: Tunnel exceeding link layer MTU didn't create route exception"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+
+ # Decrease tunnel MTU, check for PMTU decrease in route exception
+ mtu "${ns_a}" vti_a 3000
+ if [ "$(route_get_dst_pmtu_from_exception ${vti6_b_addr})" -ne 3000 ]; then
+ echo "FAIL: Decreasing tunnel MTU didn't decrease route exception PMTU"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+
+ # Increase tunnel MTU, check for PMTU increase in route exception
+ mtu "${ns_a}" vti_a 9000
+ if [ "$(route_get_dst_pmtu_from_exception ${vti6_b_addr})" -ne 9000 ]; then
+ echo "FAIL: Increasing tunnel MTU didn't increase route exception PMTU"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+
+ echo "PASS"
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+test_pmtu_vti6_exception
+
+exit 0
--
2.15.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists