[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180307123530.GC20949@bistromath.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 13:35:30 +0100
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Atul Gupta <atul.gupta@...lsio.com>
Cc: davejwatson@...com, davem@...emloft.net,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ganeshgr@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 crypto 02/12] ethtool: enable Inline TLS in HW
Since you're saying the driver supports offloading TLS records to the
HW, why not call the feature "record offloading"? With, for example,
NETIF_F_HW_TLS_RECORD as the feature, and maybe "tls-hw-record" for
the ethtool string. This "Inline TLS" name sounds rather like
marketing to me.
2018-03-06, 21:07:22 +0530, Atul Gupta wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Atul Gupta <atul.gupta@...lsio.com>
There should be a description here of what the feature covers, so that
other drivers can decide if it matches what their HW supports.
--
Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists