netdev - Re: Use of Indirect function calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180307.100637.695483960645499209.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 07 Mar 2018 10:06:37 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     rao.shoaib@...cle.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: Use of Indirect function calls

From: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:53:19 -0800

> Also while I have your attention can I ask your opinion about
> breaking up some TCP functions, mostly control functions into
> smaller units so that if a little different behavior is desired it
> can be achieved and common code could still be shared. Of course you
> can not say much without looking at the code but will you even
> entertain such a change ?

You answered your own question, I'd have to see what the change
looks like to make a determination.