[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180307173524.i6mpg3f2rjnwl3xe@localhost>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 09:35:24 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiří Pírko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Vinicius Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, anna-maria@...utronix.de,
Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Levi Pearson <levi.pearson@...man.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 net-next 08/18] net: SO_TXTIME: Add clockid and
drop_if_late params
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:01:19PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> The same choices are probably made for all packets on a given
> socket. Unless skb->sk gets scrubbed in some transmit paths,
> then these be set as sockopt instead of cmsg.
The discussion on v2 ended with this per-message idea, in preference
to the per-socket idea, IIRC.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists