netdev - Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 0/2] ntuple filters with RSS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180307.155520.2202606174341722181.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 07 Mar 2018 15:55:20 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     ecree@...arflare.com
Cc:     linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 0/2] ntuple filters with RSS

From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:40:39 +0000

> On 07/03/18 15:24, David Miller wrote:
>> Ok.
>>
>> Since nobody is really working on the ethtool --> devlink/netlink conversion,
>> it really isn't reasonable for me to block useful changes like your's.
>>
>> So please resubmit this series and I will apply it.
>>
>> Thanks.
> Ok, thanks.  Should I stick with the hackish union-and-flag-bit, or define a
>  new ethtool command number for the extended command?

I'd say stick with the union-and-flag-bit hack.