netdev - Re: [RFC v3 net-next 02/18] net: Clear skb->tstamp only on the forwarding path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <151c295e-82b7-8d3a-9ae8-a5f2906c091e@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:03:46 -0800
From:   Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiří Pírko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Vinicius Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, anna-maria@...utronix.de,
        Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Levi Pearson <levi.pearson@...man.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 net-next 02/18] net: Clear skb->tstamp only on the
 forwarding path



On 03/07/2018 08:59 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
> <jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com> wrote:
>> This is done in preparation for the upcoming time based transmission
>> patchset. Now that skb->tstamp will be used to hold packet's txtime,
>> we must ensure that it is being cleared when traversing namespaces.
>> Also, doing that from skb_scrub_packet() would break our feature when
>> tunnels are used.
> 
> Then the right location to move to is skb_scrub_packet below the test for xnet.

Fixed, thanks.



> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 +
>>  net/core/skbuff.c         | 1 -
>>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> index dbe6344b727a..7104de2bc957 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -3379,6 +3379,7 @@ static __always_inline int ____dev_forward_skb(struct net_device *dev,
>>
>>         skb_scrub_packet(skb, true);
>>         skb->priority = 0;
>> +       skb->tstamp = 0;
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> index 715c13495ba6..678fc5416ae1 100644
>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> @@ -4865,7 +4865,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_try_coalesce);
>>   */
>>  void skb_scrub_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, bool xnet)
>>  {
>> -       skb->tstamp = 0;
>>         skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
>>         skb->skb_iif = 0;
>>         skb->ignore_df = 0;
>> --
>> 2.16.2
>>