[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5ef30d9-5723-5f92-0f7b-b8d4da9a777a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:53:14 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: stephen@...workplumber.org, pmoore@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
dac.override@...il.com, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: don't unnecessarily load kernel modules in
dev_ioctl()
On 03/08/2018 10:11 AM, David Miller wrote:
> Yeah, understood. At small scale the current behavior maybe made
> sense, but these days it really doesn't.
>
> No objections to the knob if you want to submit it.
>
Thanks David, I have rebased my patch and sent it.
New numbers on net-next are looking very nice, thanks to Kirill work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists