| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 23:46:04 -0500
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 2/8] bnxt_en: Fix vnic accounting in the bnxt_check_rings() path.
From: Eddie Wai <eddie.wai@...adcom.com>
The number of vnics to check must be determined ahead of time because
only standard RX rings require vnics to support RFS. The logic is
similar to the ring reservation logic and we can now use the
refactored common functions to do most of the work in setting up
the firmware message.
Fixes: 8f23d638b36b ("bnxt_en: Expand bnxt_check_rings() to check all resources.")
Signed-off-by: Eddie Wai <eddie.wai@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 64 ++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 377fceb..b847d54 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -4764,39 +4764,25 @@ static bool bnxt_need_reserve_rings(struct bnxt *bp)
}
static int bnxt_hwrm_check_vf_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int tx_rings, int rx_rings,
- int ring_grps, int cp_rings)
+ int ring_grps, int cp_rings, int vnics)
{
struct hwrm_func_vf_cfg_input req = {0};
- u32 flags, enables;
+ u32 flags;
int rc;
if (!(bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_NEW_RM))
return 0;
- bnxt_hwrm_cmd_hdr_init(bp, &req, HWRM_FUNC_VF_CFG, -1, -1);
+ __bnxt_hwrm_reserve_vf_rings(bp, &req, tx_rings, rx_rings, ring_grps,
+ cp_rings, vnics);
flags = FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_TX_ASSETS_TEST |
FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_RX_ASSETS_TEST |
FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_CMPL_ASSETS_TEST |
FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_RING_GRP_ASSETS_TEST |
FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_STAT_CTX_ASSETS_TEST |
FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_VNIC_ASSETS_TEST;
- enables = FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_TX_RINGS |
- FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_RX_RINGS |
- FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_CMPL_RINGS |
- FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_HW_RING_GRPS |
- FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_STAT_CTXS |
- FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_VNICS;
req.flags = cpu_to_le32(flags);
- req.enables = cpu_to_le32(enables);
- req.num_tx_rings = cpu_to_le16(tx_rings);
- req.num_rx_rings = cpu_to_le16(rx_rings);
- req.num_cmpl_rings = cpu_to_le16(cp_rings);
- req.num_hw_ring_grps = cpu_to_le16(ring_grps);
- req.num_stat_ctxs = cpu_to_le16(cp_rings);
- req.num_vnics = cpu_to_le16(1);
- if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
- req.num_vnics = cpu_to_le16(rx_rings + 1);
rc = hwrm_send_message_silent(bp, &req, sizeof(req), HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT);
if (rc)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -4804,38 +4790,23 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_check_vf_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int tx_rings, int rx_rings,
}
static int bnxt_hwrm_check_pf_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int tx_rings, int rx_rings,
- int ring_grps, int cp_rings)
+ int ring_grps, int cp_rings, int vnics)
{
struct hwrm_func_cfg_input req = {0};
- u32 flags, enables;
+ u32 flags;
int rc;
- bnxt_hwrm_cmd_hdr_init(bp, &req, HWRM_FUNC_CFG, -1, -1);
- req.fid = cpu_to_le16(0xffff);
+ __bnxt_hwrm_reserve_pf_rings(bp, &req, tx_rings, rx_rings, ring_grps,
+ cp_rings, vnics);
flags = FUNC_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_TX_ASSETS_TEST;
- enables = FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_TX_RINGS;
- req.num_tx_rings = cpu_to_le16(tx_rings);
- if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_NEW_RM) {
+ if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_NEW_RM)
flags |= FUNC_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_RX_ASSETS_TEST |
FUNC_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_CMPL_ASSETS_TEST |
FUNC_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_RING_GRP_ASSETS_TEST |
FUNC_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_STAT_CTX_ASSETS_TEST |
FUNC_CFG_REQ_FLAGS_VNIC_ASSETS_TEST;
- enables |= FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_RX_RINGS |
- FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_CMPL_RINGS |
- FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_HW_RING_GRPS |
- FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_STAT_CTXS |
- FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_VNICS;
- req.num_rx_rings = cpu_to_le16(rx_rings);
- req.num_cmpl_rings = cpu_to_le16(cp_rings);
- req.num_hw_ring_grps = cpu_to_le16(ring_grps);
- req.num_stat_ctxs = cpu_to_le16(cp_rings);
- req.num_vnics = cpu_to_le16(1);
- if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
- req.num_vnics = cpu_to_le16(rx_rings + 1);
- }
+
req.flags = cpu_to_le32(flags);
- req.enables = cpu_to_le32(enables);
rc = hwrm_send_message_silent(bp, &req, sizeof(req), HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT);
if (rc)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -4843,17 +4814,17 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_check_pf_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int tx_rings, int rx_rings,
}
static int bnxt_hwrm_check_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int tx_rings, int rx_rings,
- int ring_grps, int cp_rings)
+ int ring_grps, int cp_rings, int vnics)
{
if (bp->hwrm_spec_code < 0x10801)
return 0;
if (BNXT_PF(bp))
return bnxt_hwrm_check_pf_rings(bp, tx_rings, rx_rings,
- ring_grps, cp_rings);
+ ring_grps, cp_rings, vnics);
return bnxt_hwrm_check_vf_rings(bp, tx_rings, rx_rings, ring_grps,
- cp_rings);
+ cp_rings, vnics);
}
static void bnxt_hwrm_set_coal_params(struct bnxt_coal *hw_coal,
@@ -7552,7 +7523,7 @@ int bnxt_check_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int tx, int rx, bool sh, int tcs,
int max_rx, max_tx, tx_sets = 1;
int tx_rings_needed;
int rx_rings = rx;
- int cp, rc;
+ int cp, vnics, rc;
if (tcs)
tx_sets = tcs;
@@ -7568,10 +7539,15 @@ int bnxt_check_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int tx, int rx, bool sh, int tcs,
if (max_tx < tx_rings_needed)
return -ENOMEM;
+ vnics = 1;
+ if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
+ vnics += rx_rings;
+
if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_AGG_RINGS)
rx_rings <<= 1;
cp = sh ? max_t(int, tx_rings_needed, rx) : tx_rings_needed + rx;
- return bnxt_hwrm_check_rings(bp, tx_rings_needed, rx_rings, rx, cp);
+ return bnxt_hwrm_check_rings(bp, tx_rings_needed, rx_rings, rx, cp,
+ vnics);
}
static void bnxt_unmap_bars(struct bnxt *bp, struct pci_dev *pdev)
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists