[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyt0Aua_Jzp__kTRZaiBoki6-EWmVnrFrjntpYiytqe4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:11:09 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel.h: Skip single-eval logic on literals in min()/max()
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> And sparse freaks out too:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c:97:26: sparse: incorrect
> type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected void
> *addr @@ got struct mac_regs [noderef] <avoid *addr @@
Actually, this seems a valid warning - it's assigning a __iomem
pointer to a regular void, and dropping the iomem in the process.
Sparse does *not* like VLA's, so what may be going on is that fixing
something VLA-related in your tree just makes sparse (correctly) check
something that it had given up on before.
So don't worry about the sparse ones, if they are new. They seem correct.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists