netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] net: netfilter: Replace printk() with appropriate pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:47:34 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@...il.com>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: netfilter: Replace printk() with appropriate
 pr_*() macro

Hi Joe,

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 12:52:41PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 01:11 +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> > Using pr_<loglevel>() is more concise than
> > printk(KERN_<LOGLEVEL>).
> > Replace printks having a log level with the appropriate
> > pr_*() macros.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@...il.com>
> > ---
> > changes in v2
> > *in v1 printk() were replaced with netdev_*()
> 
> >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct.c      | 2 +-
> >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c    | 2 +-
> >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp.c | 2 +-
> >  net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c            | 2 +-
> >  net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c        | 4 ++--
> >  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> None of these files have a #define for pr_fmt so this
> should be OK.

I think Arushi could add pr_fmt in the same go, so we skip another
follow up patch for this. @Arushi: I suggested this in my previous
email, please have a look.

This would also probably allows us to save the line break in the error
message, which IIRC is not a good practise either, eg.

				pr_warn("nf_queue: OOM "
					"in mangle, dropping packet\n");

> Perhaps coalesce the formats and remove the unnecessary periods too.

Yes, removing periods seems fine.

Thanks.