netdev - Re: [pci PATCH v4 1/4] pci-iov: Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Mar 2018 08:59:07 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, dan.daly@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        keith.busch@...el.com, netanel@...zon.com, mheyne@...zon.de,
        liang-min.wang@...el.com, mark.d.rustad@...el.com,
        dwmw2@...radead.org, hch@....de, dwmw@...zon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [pci PATCH v4 1/4] pci-iov: Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 09:59:09PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> I still struggle to understand why we need this "unmanaged"
> complication and how a user of the sysfs API is expected to have any
> idea whether a PF is managed or unmanaged and why they should care.
> Can't we just have a pci_simple_sriov_configure() helper and ignore
> this unmanaged business?  Thanks,

Just a pci_simple_sriov_configure is exactly what I envisioned originally.