netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Switchdev: flooding offload option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25985724-1f25-1c8b-46f0-19a88445f81e@quantenna.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:08:27 -0700
From:   Igor Mitsyanko <igor.mitsyanko.os@...ntenna.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        sergey.matyukevich.os@...ntenna.com, smaksimenko@...ntenna.com,
        ashevchenko@...ntenna.com, dlebed@...ntenna.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        ivecera@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Switchdev: flooding offload option

On 03/10/2018 02:08 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> 
> Hi Igor
> 
> You don't appear to be adding any user of this. Please also make one
> of the switchdev drivers actually use this new functionality.
> 
>     Andrew
> 

Hi Andrew, a first user is supposed to be 
drivers/net/wireless/quantenna/qtnfmac wifi driver. I will merge the 
patchset with another one that modifies qtnfmac driver (so that it has 
at least one user) and resend.

However RFC portion is still under discussion, would be good to 
understand if this approach is at all acceptable.