netdev - Re: [RESEND PATCH] rsi: Remove stack VLA usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ff9309bf-4c3d-b0f9-cdd0-429dacd3177b@lwfinger.net>
Date:   Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:06:10 -0500
From:   Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] rsi: Remove stack VLA usage

On 03/11/2018 08:43 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> The kernel would like to have all stack VLA usage removed[1].  rsi uses
> a VLA based on 'blksize'.  Elsewhere in the SDIO code maximum block size
> is defined using a magic number.  We can use a pre-processor defined
> constant and declare the array to maximum size.  We add a check before
> accessing the array in case of programmer error.
> 
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc>
> ---
> 
> RESEND: add wireless mailing list to CC's (requested by Kalle)
> 
>   drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_hal.c  | 13 +++++++------
>   drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c |  9 +++++++--
>   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_hal.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_hal.c
> index 1176de646942..839ebdd602df 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_hal.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_hal.c
> @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static int ping_pong_write(struct rsi_hw *adapter, u8 cmd, u8 *addr, u32 size)
>   	u32 cmd_addr;
>   	u16 cmd_resp, cmd_req;
>   	u8 *str;
> -	int status;
> +	int status, ret;
>   
>   	if (cmd == PING_WRITE) {
>   		cmd_addr = PING_BUFFER_ADDRESS;
> @@ -655,12 +655,13 @@ static int ping_pong_write(struct rsi_hw *adapter, u8 cmd, u8 *addr, u32 size)
>   		str = "PONG_VALID";
>   	}
>   
> -	status = hif_ops->load_data_master_write(adapter, cmd_addr, size,
> +	ret = hif_ops->load_data_master_write(adapter, cmd_addr, size,
>   					    block_size, addr);
> -	if (status) {
> -		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "%s: Unable to write blk at addr %0x\n",
> -			__func__, *addr);
> -		return status;
> +	if (ret) {
> +		if (ret != -EINVAL)
> +			rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "%s: Unable to write blk at addr %0x\n",
> +				__func__, *addr);
> +		return ret;
>   	}
>   
>   	status = bl_cmd(adapter, cmd_req, cmd_resp, str);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
> index b0cf41195051..b766578b591a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>   #include "rsi_common.h"
>   #include "rsi_hal.h"
>   
> +#define RSI_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE 256
> +
>   /**
>    * rsi_sdio_set_cmd52_arg() - This function prepares cmd 52 read/write arg.
>    * @rw: Read/write
> @@ -362,7 +364,7 @@ static int rsi_setblocklength(struct rsi_hw *adapter, u32 length)
>   	rsi_dbg(INIT_ZONE, "%s: Setting the block length\n", __func__);
>   
>   	status = sdio_set_block_size(dev->pfunction, length);
> -	dev->pfunction->max_blksize = 256;
> +	dev->pfunction->max_blksize = RSI_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE;
>   	adapter->block_size = dev->pfunction->max_blksize;
>   
>   	rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE,
> @@ -567,9 +569,12 @@ static int rsi_sdio_load_data_master_write(struct rsi_hw *adapter,
>   {
>   	u32 num_blocks, offset, i;
>   	u16 msb_address, lsb_address;
> -	u8 temp_buf[block_size];
> +	u8 temp_buf[RSI_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE];
>   	int status;
>   
> +	if (block_size > RSI_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>   	num_blocks = instructions_sz / block_size;
>   	msb_address = base_address >> 16;

I am not giving this patch a negative review, but my solution to the same 
problem has been to change the on-stack array into a u8 pointer, use kmalloc() 
to assign the space, and then free that space at the end. That way large stack 
allocations are avoided, with a minimum of changes.

Larry

>   
>