lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:28:50 +0100
From:   Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
To:     Atul Gupta <atul.gupta@...lsio.com>
Cc:     davejwatson@...com, davem@...emloft.net,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, sd@...asysnail.net,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        ganeshgr@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 crypto 08/11] chtls: CPL handler definition

On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 00:40:13 +0530
Atul Gupta <atul.gupta@...lsio.com> wrote:

> Exchange CPL messages with hardware to program the TLS session
> CPL handlers defined to process messages received from chip.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atul Gupta <atul.gupta@...lsio.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/chelsio/chtls/chtls_cm.c | 2041 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c                |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 2042 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/chelsio/chtls/chtls_cm.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/chelsio/chtls/chtls_cm.c b/drivers/crypto/chelsio/chtls/chtls_cm.c
>
> [...]
>
> +static void send_defer_abort_rpl(struct chtls_dev *cdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	struct cpl_abort_req_rss *req = cplhdr(skb);
> +	struct sk_buff *reply_skb;
> +
> +	reply_skb = alloc_skb(sizeof(struct cpl_abort_rpl),
> +			      GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> +	if (!reply_skb)
> +		return;

This will never happen. By the way, is there really no way to handle a
failure here?

-- 
Stefano

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ