netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/30] Netfilter/IPVS updates for net-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180313153924.GE31828@breakpoint.cc>
Date:   Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:39:24 +0100
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     fw@...len.de, nbd@....name, pablo@...filter.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] Netfilter/IPVS updates for net-next

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
[ flow tables ]
> Ok, that seems to constrain the exposure.
> 
> We should talk at some point about how exposed conntrack itself is.

Sure, we can do that.

If you have specific scenarios (synflood, peer that opens
100k (legitimate) connections, perpetual-fin, etc) in mind let me know,
i do think that we could still do better in some cases.