[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180313211355.GD21498@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:13:55 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, stephen@...workplumber.org,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 iproute2-next 0/6] cm_id, cq, mr, and pd resource
tracking
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:45:12PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/13/18 1:32 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:53:03AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> >> On 3/12/18 8:16 AM, Steve Wise wrote:
> >>> Hey all,
> >>>
> >>> The kernel side of this series has been merged for rdma-next [1]. Let me
> >>> know if this iproute2 series can be merged, of if it needs more changes.
> >>>
> >>
> >> The problem is that iproute2 headers are synced to kernel headers from
> >> DaveM's tree (net-next mainly). I take it this series will not appear in
> >> Dave's tree until after a merge through Linus' tree. Correct?
> >
> > David,
> >
> > Technically, you are right, and we would like to ask you for an extra tweak
> > to the flow for the RDMAtool, because current scheme causes delays at least
> > cycle.
> >
> > Every RDMAtool's patchset which requires changes to headers is always
> > includes header patch, can you please accept those series and once you
> > are bringing new net-next headers from Linus, simply overwrite all our
> > headers?
>
> I did not follow the discussion back when this decision was made, so how
> did rdma tool end up in iproute2? I do not need the overhead of
> sometimes I sync the rdma header file and sometimes I don't.
Could you pull the uapi headers from linux-next? That tree will have
both netdev and rdma stuff merged together properly.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists