[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180313070953.21317-2-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:09:45 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] xfrm: Refuse to insert 32 bit userspace socket policies on 64 bit systems
We don't have a compat layer for xfrm, so userspace and kernel
structures have different sizes in this case. This results in
a broken configuration, so refuse to configure socket policies
when trying to insert from 32 bit userspace as we do it already
with policies inserted via netlink.
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e1a1577ca8bcb47b769a@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index 54e21f19d722..f9d2f2233f09 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -2056,6 +2056,11 @@ int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, int optname, u8 __user *optval, int optlen
struct xfrm_mgr *km;
struct xfrm_policy *pol = NULL;
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+ if (in_compat_syscall())
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+#endif
+
if (!optval && !optlen) {
xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, NULL);
xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, NULL);
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists