[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180313070953.21317-6-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:09:49 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] xfrm: do not call rcu_read_unlock when afinfo is NULL in xfrm_get_tos
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
When xfrm_policy_get_afinfo returns NULL, it will not hold rcu
read lock. In this case, rcu_read_unlock should not be called
in xfrm_get_tos, just like other places where it's calling
xfrm_policy_get_afinfo.
Fixes: f5e2bb4f5b22 ("xfrm: policy: xfrm_get_tos cannot fail")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 8b3811ff002d..150d46633ce6 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1458,10 +1458,13 @@ xfrm_tmpl_resolve(struct xfrm_policy **pols, int npols, const struct flowi *fl,
static int xfrm_get_tos(const struct flowi *fl, int family)
{
const struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *afinfo;
- int tos = 0;
+ int tos;
afinfo = xfrm_policy_get_afinfo(family);
- tos = afinfo ? afinfo->get_tos(fl) : 0;
+ if (!afinfo)
+ return 0;
+
+ tos = afinfo->get_tos(fl);
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists