lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:30:49 +0000 From: Razvan Stefanescu <razvan.stefanescu@....com> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> CC: "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, "stuyoder@...il.com" <stuyoder@...il.com>, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/6] staging: fsl-dpaa2/ethsw: Add APIs for DPSW object > > Can you resend this series and just use the correct SPDX identifiers for > all of the new files, instead of all of this horrid boiler-plate code? > > That will save me time when I have to go delete all of this in the near > future :) > > Also, why dual license it? Are you _SURE_ you want to do that, and are > totally aware of all of the crazy issues surrounding it? Hint, it > almost never means what you might think it does, and I have yet to know > of anyone doing anything "real" with any dual-licensed Linux kernel > code. > > Remember, BSD is not the license you want/need for GPL header files that > are exposed to userspace... > > > thanks, > > greg k-h Thank you for your observation. I will update the patches with the SPDX identifiers. Razvan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists