netdev - Re: [RESEND] rsi: Remove stack VLA usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87k1uf6mz3.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:11:12 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] rsi: Remove stack VLA usage

"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:00:47PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:17 PM, tcharding <me@...in.cc> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 09:46:06AM +0000, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> >> tcharding <me@...in.cc> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm pretty much sure it depends on the original email headers, like
>> above ^^^ — no name.
>> Perhaps git config on your side should be done.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion Andy but the 'tcharding' as the name was
> munged by either Kalle or patchwork.  I'm guessing patchwork.

You guessed corretly, patchwork is here to blame. I sent my "please
rebase" mail earlier in this thread using my custom patchwork client
script (pwcli) which takes the name and address from patchwork.

Andy, this is definitely a bug in patchwork and I have seen this issue
multiple times already. I have understood that it has been fixed in a
recent version but patchwork.kernel.org is still running an old version.
In the original mail Tobin did have the correct From header which can be
checked from the headers in patch page[1]:

From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10274983/

-- 
Kalle Valo