netdev - Fw: [Bug 199121] New: Packet header is incorrect when following through an IPsec tunnel after upgrade kernel to 4.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180315075951.2cee5ea0@xeon-e3>
Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 07:59:51 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 199121] New: Packet header is incorrect when following
 through an IPsec tunnel after upgrade kernel to 4.15



Begin forwarded message:

Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 06:37:27 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: [Bug 199121] New: Packet header is incorrect when following through an IPsec tunnel after upgrade kernel to 4.15


https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199121

            Bug ID: 199121
           Summary: Packet header is incorrect when following through an
                    IPsec tunnel after upgrade kernel to 4.15
           Product: Networking
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 4.15.9
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: Other
          Assignee: stephen@...workplumber.org
          Reporter: posonsky@...dex.ru
        Regression: No

I have been using IPsec tunnel for a while. StrongSwan is used for management:
```
# swanctl -l
pfsense2: #1, ESTABLISHED, IKEv2, cc04d3c5b34b4bda_i* f150c78e4fc042ef_r
  local  '90.188.239.175' @ 90.188.239.175[500]
  remote '62.152.54.102' @ 62.152.54.102[500]
  3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048
  established 649s ago, reauth in 2746s
  pfsense2: #1, reqid 1, INSTALLED, TUNNEL, ESP:AES_CBC-256/HMAC_SHA1_96
    installed 649s ago, rekeying in 286s, expires in 551s
    in  c41e18d6,    588 bytes,     7 packets,   643s ago
    out cfad3c32,    588 bytes,     7 packets,   643s ago
    local  192.168.8.0/24
    remote 10.10.1.0/24
```
And everything worked fine. But after updating to 4.15 traffic stopped passing.

I created [issue](https://wiki.strongswan.org/issues/2571) on
wiki.strongswan.org. During the analysis of the situation it was found, when I
try to send ICMP request to 10.10.1.248, for example, 
```
$ ping 10.10.1.248
PING 10.10.1.248 (10.10.1.248) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 10.10.1.248 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 3068ms
```
the response is returned as if from 8.0.1.248.
```
# tcpdump -n -vv -i ppp0 icmp
dropped privs to tcpdump
tcpdump: listening on ppp0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture size
262144 bytes
01:42:37.767964 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 42527, offset 0, flags [none], proto
ICMP (1), length 84)
    10.10.1.248 > 192.168.8.1: ICMP echo reply, id 12345, seq 1, length 64
01:42:38.767950 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 42736, offset 0, flags [none], proto
ICMP (1), length 84)
    10.10.1.248 > 192.168.8.1: ICMP echo reply, id 12345, seq 2, length 64
01:42:39.771778 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 42807, offset 0, flags [none], proto
ICMP (1), length 84)
    10.10.1.248 > 192.168.8.1: ICMP echo reply, id 12345, seq 3, length 64
01:42:40.768358 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 42816, offset 0, flags [none], proto
ICMP (1), length 84)
    10.10.1.248 > 192.168.8.1: ICMP echo reply, id 12345, seq 4, length 64
```
I have tested on all versions of 4.15 since 4.15.1.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.