[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2c0d3f2-388f-2e56-73aa-74eb2163e91d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 22:19:38 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: sched: fix uses after free
On 03/14/2018 08:10 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 03/14/2018 06:53 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> syzbot reported one use-after-free in pfifo_fast_enqueue() [1]
>>
>> Issue here is that we can not reuse skb after a successful skb_array_produce()
>> since another cpu might have consumed it already.
>>
>> I believe a similar problem exists in try_bulk_dequeue_skb_slow()
>> in case we put an skb into qdisc_enqueue_skb_bad_txq() for lockless qdisc.
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> Fixes: c5ad119fb6c0 ("net: sched: pfifo_fast use skb_array")
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+ed43b6903ab968b16f54@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
>> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>> ---
>> net/sched/sch_generic.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
>
>> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
>> index 190570f21b208d5a17943360a3a6f85e1c2a2187..7e3fbe9cc936be376b66a5b12bf8957c3b601f2c 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
>> @@ -106,6 +106,14 @@ static inline void qdisc_enqueue_skb_bad_txq(struct Qdisc *q,
>>
>> __skb_queue_tail(&q->skb_bad_txq, skb);
>>
>> + if (qdisc_is_percpu_stats(q)) {
>> + qdisc_qstats_cpu_backlog_inc(q, skb);
>
> So I guess the skb access above needs to be removed as
> well per your comment in the commit description. But that
> can be another patch.
>
Actually this is fine I read this too quickly on first
read.
Sorry for the noise. Looks good to me.
>> + qdisc_qstats_cpu_qlen_inc(q);
>> + } else {
>> + qdisc_qstats_backlog_inc(q, skb);
>> + q->q.qlen++;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (lock)
>> spin_unlock(lock);
>> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists