lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180316.100502.1719064295298272655.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:05:02 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, brandon.carpenter@...herpath.com,
        vyasevic@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] Fix vlan untag and insertion for bridge and
 vlan with reorder_hdr off

From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:51:26 +0900

> As Brandon Carpenter reported[1], sending non-vlan-offloaded packets from
> bridge devices ends up with corrupted packets. He narrowed down this problem
> and found that the root cause is in skb_reorder_vlan_header().
> 
> While I was working on fixing this problem, I found that the function does
> not work properly for double tagged packets with reorder_hdr off as well.
> 
> Patch 1 fixes these 2 problems in skb_reorder_vlan_header().
> 
> And it turned out that fixing skb_reorder_vlan_header() is not sufficient
> to receive double tagged packets with reorder_hdr off while I was testing the
> fix. Vlan tags got out of order when vlan devices with reorder_hdr disabled
> were stacked. Patch 2 fixes this problem.
> 
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ethernet-bridging/msg07039.html

Series applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.

I was thinking of pushing back on the addition of the ETH_TLEN UAPI visible
macro, because I don't see any other system providing that define.  But in
the end I decided that it's harmless and really that header file is the
correct location for such a definition.

Thank you.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ