[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f008585-9276-35b6-f259-9d1e754fdd22@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:08:55 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, stephen@...workplumber.org,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 iproute2-next 0/6] cm_id, cq, mr, and pd resource
tracking
On 3/14/18 8:29 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 08:14:53PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 3/13/18 2:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> Could you pull the uapi headers from linux-next? That tree will have
>>> both netdev and rdma stuff merged together properly.
>>
>> What's the merge history between linux-next, Linus' tree, net-next +
>> rdma-next?
>
> Not sure I understand the question?
>
> linux-next is thrown away every cycle, so for instance you can't say
> "took uapi headers from linux-next commit XYZ" in the iproute git
> commit..
>
> Otherwise, linux-next is built, I think daily/weekly and includes the
> latest of both rdma and netdev next trees, so it certainly has the
> right content.
>
> A script could figure out the stable netdev and rdma commit IDs from
> linux-next and record those, if that is interest..
I'd prefer not to sync headers to a tree that disappears; I like the
traceability to specific points in time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists