[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180316020528.GA27212@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 20:05:28 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the
rdma-fixes tree
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:18:02PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> Here's the commit (from the rdma git repo) with the proper merge fix
> (although it also has other minor merge stuff that needs to be ignored):
>
> 2d873449a202 (Merge branch 'k.o/wip/dl-for-rc' into k.o/wip/dl-for-next)
Stephen,
If you merge the branches in the order:
rdma for-next, rdma for-rc, then net-next
you should not see a merge conflict as rdma for-next already has the
correct resolution.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists