lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180316133733.5be5be82@xeon-e3>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:37:33 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Alexander Zubkov <green@....ru>
Cc:     Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] treat "default" and "all"/"any" parameters
 differenty

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:19:45 +0100
Alexander Zubkov <green@....ru> wrote:

> Debian maintainer found that basic command:
> 	# ip route flush all
> No longer worked as expected which breaks user scripts and
> expectations. It no longer flushed all IPv4 routes.
> 
> Recently behaviour of "default" prefix parameter was corrected. But at
> the same time behaviour of "all"/"any" was altered too, because they
> were the same branch of the code. As those parameters mean different,
> they need to be treated differently in code too. This patch reflects
> the difference.
> 
> Reported-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Zubkov <green@....ru>
> ---
>   lib/utils.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/utils.c b/lib/utils.c
> index 9fa5220..b289d9c 100644
> --- a/lib/utils.c
> +++ b/lib/utils.c
> @@ -658,7 +658,8 @@ int get_prefix_1(inet_prefix *dst, char *arg, int 
> family)
>   		dst->family = family;
>   		dst->bytelen = 0;
>   		dst->bitlen = 0;
> -		dst->flags |= PREFIXLEN_SPECIFIED;
> +		if (strcmp(arg, "default") == 0)
> +			dst->flags |= PREFIXLEN_SPECIFIED;
>   		return 0;
>   	}
> 
> --
> 1.9.1
> 

Which code is this a patch against? the current master or followup to my revert
of the original patch?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ