netdev - Re: HW question: i210 vs. BCM5461S over SGMII: no response from PHY to MDIO requests?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180316210240.GB8735@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 22:02:40 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Frantisek Rysanek <Frantisek.Rysanek@...t.cz>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HW question: i210 vs. BCM5461S over SGMII: no response from PHY
 to MDIO requests?

> The DeLock board is this beauty:
> http://www.delock.de/produkte/G_89481/merkmale.html?setLanguage=en
> DeLock techsupport were so kind as to provide me with a schematic 
> snippet, showing the wiring of the i210 fiber SKU's dedicated 
> I2C/MDIO pins to the SFP socket's standard I2C pins. There are 
> pull-up resistors on the board for SDA/SCL. Nothing outright custom 
> here - more likely close to some Intel reference design. The board 
> works just fine.

I would suggest you ignore MDIO and try looking on the I2C bus.

Does ethtool -m show anything useful?

     Andrew