lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:32:22 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
        linux-mm@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] page_frag_cache: Store metadata in struct page



On 03/16/2018 02:05 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
  
> 
> Obviously if the problem turns out to be the cacheline thrashing rather
> than the call to page_to_virt, then this is pointless to test.
> 
>> I won't be able to test the patches until next week, but I expect I
>> will probably see a noticeable regression when performing a small
>> packet routing test.
> 
> I really appreciate you being willing to try this for me.  I need to
> get myself a dual-socket machine to test things like this.
>

It seems my prior mail/answer was lost.

Issue is cacheline thrashing indeed, particularly on PowerPC (64 KB pages)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ