[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180317.165458.1452469008226572576.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 16:54:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alexander.duyck@...il.com
Cc: willy@...radead.org, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
linux-mm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mawilcox@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] page_frag_cache: Store metadata in struct page
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:26:28 -0700
> So my concern with this patch is that it is essentially trading off
> CPU performance for reduced size. One of the reasons for getting away
> from using the page pointer is because it is expensive to access the
> page when the ref_count is bouncing on multiple cache lines.
Agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists