netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Add support for warnings to extack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f894da5-6e45-c70c-e061-e7572a4390f1@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 18 Mar 2018 10:11:52 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexander Aring <aring@...atatu.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Add support for warnings to extack

On 3/16/18 1:23 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Currently we have the limitation that warnings cannot be reported though
> extack. For example, when tc flower failed to get offloaded but got
> installed on software datapath. The hardware failure is not fatal and
> thus extack is not even shared with the driver, so the error is simply
> omitted from any logging.

If this set ends up moving forward, the above statement needs to be
corrected: extack allows non-error messages to be sent back to the user,
so the above must be talking about some other limitation local to tc.