netdev - [bpf-next PATCH v3 10/18] bpf: add verifier tests for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180318195736.14466.506.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date:   Sun, 18 Mar 2018 12:57:36 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     davejwatson@...com, davem@...emloft.net, daniel@...earbox.net,
        ast@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [bpf-next PATCH v3 10/18] bpf: add verifier tests for
 BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG

Test read and writes for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG.

Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 86d7ff4..3e7718b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -1597,6 +1597,60 @@ struct test_val {
 		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
 	},
 	{
+		"direct packet read for SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
+		"direct packet write for SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
+		"overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
 		"check skb->mark is not writeable by sockets",
 		.insns = {
 			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,