[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ff0a81f55a84069a4652d02a4212b70@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:01:07 +0000
From: Yan Markman <ymarkman@...vell.com>
To: Stefan Chulski <stefanc@...vell.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
"gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com" <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
"maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com" <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
"miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
"mw@...ihalf.com" <mw@...ihalf.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 02/10] net: phy: phylink: allow 10GKR
interface to use in-band negotiation
The DTS-patch for this board (in "old" format) is attached
Yan Markman
Tel. 05-44732819
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Chulski
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 2:58 PM
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>; Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net; kishon@...com; gregory.clement@...tlin.com; andrew@...n.ch; jason@...edaemon.net; sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com; maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com; miquel.raynal@...tlin.com; Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>; Yan Markman <ymarkman@...vell.com>; mw@...ihalf.com; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 02/10] net: phy: phylink: allow 10GKR interface to use in-band negotiation
> > > There is no inband negotiation like there is with 802.3z or SGMII,
> > > so this makes no sense.
> >
> > Oh, that's what I feared. I read some docs but probably will need
> > more
> > :)
> >
> > Anyway, the reason to use in-band negotiation was also to avoid
> > using fixed-link. It would work but always report the link is up,
> > which for the user isn't a great experience as we have a way to detect this.
> >
> > What would you suggest to achieve this in a reasonable way?
>
> The intention of this test in phylink_of_phy_connect() is to avoid
> failing when there is no requirement for a PHY to be present (such as
> a fixed link, or an 802.3z link.) However, with 10G PHYs such as the
> 3310, we need the PHY so we can read the speed from it, and so know
> whether to downgrade the MAC to SGMII mode, or having downgraded the
> MAC, upgrade it back to 10G mode when the PHY switches to 10G.
>
> I'm guessing that you're wanting this for the DB boards, but I don't see why.
> Do they not have PHYs?
New Solid Run board MACCHIATObin Single Shot doesn't has 3310 PHY either, like DB boards.
https://www.cnx-software.com/2017/12/20/solidrun-macchiatobin-single-shot-networking-board-launched-for-269-and-up/
Stefan,
Best Regards.
Download attachment "0001-arm64-dts-marvell-add-new-mcbin-single-shot-board.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (9179 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists