netdev - Re: [bpf-next PATCH v3 07/18] bpf: sockmap, add msg_cork

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180319163012.imwxwjcp7x6dpi65@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:30:13 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc:     davejwatson@...com, davem@...emloft.net, daniel@...earbox.net,
        ast@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf-next PATCH v3 07/18] bpf: sockmap, add msg_cork_bytes()
 helper

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:57:20PM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> In the case where we need a specific number of bytes before a
> verdict can be assigned, even if the data spans multiple sendmsg
> or sendfile calls. The BPF program may use msg_cork_bytes().
> 
> The extreme case is a user can call sendmsg repeatedly with
> 1-byte msg segments. Obviously, this is bad for performance but
> is still valid. If the BPF program needs N bytes to validate
> a header it can use msg_cork_bytes to specify N bytes and the
> BPF program will not be called again until N bytes have been
> accumulated. The infrastructure will attempt to coalesce data
> if possible so in many cases (most my use cases at least) the
> data will be in a single scatterlist element with data pointers
> pointing to start/end of the element. However, this is dependent
> on available memory so is not guaranteed. So BPF programs must
> validate data pointer ranges, but this is the case anyways to
> convince the verifier the accesses are valid.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |    3 ++-
>  net/core/filter.c        |   16 ++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index a557a2a..1765cfb 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -792,7 +792,8 @@ struct bpf_stack_build_id {
>  	FN(override_return),		\
>  	FN(sock_ops_cb_flags_set),	\
>  	FN(msg_redirect_map),		\
> -	FN(msg_apply_bytes),
> +	FN(msg_apply_bytes),		\
> +	FN(msg_cork_bytes),
>  
>  /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
>   * function eBPF program intends to call
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 17d6775..0c9daf6 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -1942,6 +1942,20 @@ struct sock *do_msg_redirect_map(struct sk_msg_buff *msg)
>  	.arg2_type      = ARG_ANYTHING,
>  };
>  
> +BPF_CALL_2(bpf_msg_cork_bytes, struct sk_msg_buff *, msg, u32, bytes)
> +{
> +	msg->cork_bytes = bytes;
> +	return 0;
> +}

my understanding that setting it here and in the other helper *_bytes to zero
will be effectively a nop. Right?

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>