[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180319163713.GH26039@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:37:13 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: novice fixes and irq handling
> interrupt-parent = <&gpiosb>;
> interrupts = <23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>
> to the switch of the espressobin's dtb, the irq couldn't be used. The
> reason is the interaction of several things:
>
> - On the first try to probe the switch, the driver did:
>
> irq = of_irq_get(np, 0);
> request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, func, IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, ...);
Hi Uwe
It looks like we should just drop IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING from here. The
interrupt trigger will be configured by of_irq_get(). All the current
DT files actually list it as IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW.
> When I tested the second change however the driver still failed
> because the gpio controller doesn't support level sensitive
> irqs. :-|
Do you have documentation for the SoC? Is it a hardware limitation, or
just missing from the pinctrl driver?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists