netdev - Re: recursive static routes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAeewD_XSQMv=MYWUry6NYCfCrq8qxLuOQknuH5oK2m2icjLXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:35:12 +0200
From:   Saku Ytti <saku@...i.fi>
To:     David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: recursive static routes

Hey,

> you want per-packet overhead instead of deferring the overhead event
> based updates? network events tend to be much less frequent than
> sending/forwarding packets

Depending on performance cost and complexity cost of options.

-- 
  ++ytti