[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152145092288.7718.16666188698174487102.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:15:22 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
yotamg@...lanox.com, soheil@...gle.com, avagin@...tuozzo.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, fw@...len.de,
roman.kapl@...go.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
andreyknvl@...gle.com, lkp@...el.com, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net: Replace ip_ra_lock with per-net mutex
Since ra_chain is per-net, we may use per-net mutexes
to protect them in ip_ra_control(). This improves
scalability.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
---
include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 1 +
net/core/net_namespace.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 15 ++++++---------
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
index 97d7ee6667c7..8491bc9c86b1 100644
--- a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct netns_ipv4 {
struct ipv4_devconf *devconf_all;
struct ipv4_devconf *devconf_dflt;
struct ip_ra_chain __rcu *ra_chain;
+ struct mutex ra_mutex;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES
struct fib_rules_ops *rules_ops;
bool fib_has_custom_rules;
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index c340d5cfbdec..95ba2c53bd9a 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ static __net_init int setup_net(struct net *net, struct user_namespace *user_ns)
net->user_ns = user_ns;
idr_init(&net->netns_ids);
spin_lock_init(&net->nsid_lock);
+ mutex_init(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
error = ops_init(ops, net);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
index f36d35fe924b..5ad2d8ed3a3f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -322,9 +322,6 @@ int ip_cmsg_send(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, struct ipcm_cookie *ipc,
return 0;
}
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ip_ra_lock);
-
-
static void ip_ra_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct ip_ra_chain *ra = container_of(head, struct ip_ra_chain, rcu);
@@ -345,21 +342,21 @@ int ip_ra_control(struct sock *sk, unsigned char on,
new_ra = on ? kmalloc(sizeof(*new_ra), GFP_KERNEL) : NULL;
- spin_lock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
for (rap = &net->ipv4.ra_chain;
(ra = rcu_dereference_protected(*rap,
- lockdep_is_held(&ip_ra_lock))) != NULL;
+ lockdep_is_held(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex))) != NULL;
rap = &ra->next) {
if (ra->sk == sk) {
if (on) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
kfree(new_ra);
return -EADDRINUSE;
}
/* dont let ip_call_ra_chain() use sk again */
ra->sk = NULL;
RCU_INIT_POINTER(*rap, ra->next);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
if (ra->destructor)
ra->destructor(sk);
@@ -374,7 +371,7 @@ int ip_ra_control(struct sock *sk, unsigned char on,
}
}
if (!new_ra) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
return -ENOBUFS;
}
new_ra->sk = sk;
@@ -383,7 +380,7 @@ int ip_ra_control(struct sock *sk, unsigned char on,
RCU_INIT_POINTER(new_ra->next, ra);
rcu_assign_pointer(*rap, new_ra);
sock_hold(sk);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists