Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:00:11 +0530
From:   Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ganesh GR <ganeshgr@...lsio.com>,
        Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@...lsio.com>,
        Indranil Choudhury <indranil@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/2] kernel: add support to collect hardware logs in
 crash recovery kernel

On Monday, March 03/19/18, 2018 at 20:52:11 +0530, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:25:56 +0530
> Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, March 03/16/18, 2018 at 16:42:03 +0530, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> > > On production servers running variety of workloads over time, kernel
> > > panic can happen sporadically after days or even months. It is
> > > important to collect as much debug logs as possible to root cause
> > > and fix the problem, that may not be easy to reproduce. Snapshot of
> > > underlying hardware/firmware state (like register dump, firmware
> > > logs, adapter memory, etc.), at the time of kernel panic will be very
> > > helpful while debugging the culprit device driver.
> > > 
> > > This series of patches add new generic framework that enable device
> > > drivers to collect device specific snapshot of the hardware/firmware
> > > state of the underlying device in the crash recovery kernel. In crash
> > > recovery kernel, the collected logs are exposed via /proc/crashdd/
> > > directory, which is copied by user space scripts for post-analysis.
> > > 
> > > A kernel module crashdd is newly added. In crash recovery kernel,
> > > crashdd exposes /proc/crashdd/ directory containing device specific
> > > hardware/firmware logs.
> > > 
> > > The sequence of actions done by device drivers to append their device
> > > specific hardware/firmware logs to /proc/crashdd/ directory are as
> > > follows:
> > > 
> > > 1. During probe (before hardware is initialized), device drivers
> > > register to the crashdd module (via crashdd_add_dump()), with
> > > callback function, along with buffer size and log name needed for
> > > firmware/hardware log collection.
> > > 
> > > 2. Crashdd creates a driver's directory under /proc/crashdd/<driver>.
> > > Then, it allocates the buffer with requested size and invokes the
> > > device driver's registered callback function.
> > > 
> > > 3. Device driver collects all hardware/firmware logs into the buffer
> > > and returns control back to crashdd.
> > > 
> > > 4. Crashdd exposes the buffer as a file via
> > > /proc/crashdd/<driver>/<dump_file>.
> > > 
> > > 5. User space script (/usr/lib/kdump/kdump-lib-initramfs.sh) copies
> > > the entire /proc/crashdd/ directory to /var/crash/ directory.
> > > 
> > > Patch 1 adds crashdd module to allow drivers to register callback to
> > > collect the device specific hardware/firmware logs.  The module also
> > > exports /proc/crashdd/ directory containing the hardware/firmware logs.
> > > 
> > > Patch 2 shows a cxgb4 driver example using the API to collect
> > > hardware/firmware logs in crash recovery kernel, before hardware is
> > > initialized.  The logs for the devices are made available under
> > > /proc/crashdd/cxgb4/ directory.
> > > 
> > > Suggestions and feedback will be much appreciated.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rahul
> > > 
> > > RFC v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg486562.html
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > - Added new crashdd module that exports /proc/crashdd/ containing
> > >   driver's registered hardware/firmware logs in patch 1.
> > > - Replaced the API to allow drivers to register their hardware/firmware
> > >   log collect routine in crash recovery kernel in patch 1.
> > > - Updated patch 2 to use the new API in patch 1.
> > > 
> > > Rahul Lakkireddy (2):
> > >   proc/crashdd: add API to collect hardware dump in second kernel
> > >   cxgb4: collect hardware dump in second kernel
> > > 
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4.h       |   4 +
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_cudbg.c |  25 +++
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_cudbg.h |   3 +
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c  |  12 ++
> > >  fs/proc/Kconfig                                  |  11 +
> > >  fs/proc/Makefile                                 |   1 +
> > >  fs/proc/crashdd.c                                | 263 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/crashdd.h                          |  43 ++++
> > >  8 files changed, 362 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 fs/proc/crashdd.c
> > >  create mode 100644 include/linux/crashdd.h
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.14.1
> > >   
> > 
> > Does anyone have any comments with this approach?  If there are no
> > comments, then I'll re-spin this RFC to Patch series.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rahul
> 
> This does look like it gives useful data, but it is not clear that this can
> not already be done with existing API's or small extensions.
> 
> Introducing a new /proc interface and one that is mostly device specific is
> unlikely to be greeted with a warm reception by the current Linux kernel community.
> 
> For example, getting firmware logs seems like something more related to
> ethtool or sysfs.

The /proc/crashdd/ is only exposed in 2nd (crash recovery) kernel.
This is similar to /proc/vmcore.  Since vmcore is exported via
/proc/ interface, I've exported the device specific logs also via
/proc/crashdd/.

I can change to sysfs if that is the preferred approach.  Does
/sys/crashdd/ sound good?

Thanks,
Rahul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists