lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 20:48:23 +0000
From:   "Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
To:     "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Philippe Ombredanne" <pombredanne@...b.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
        "sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
        "jogreene@...hat.com" <jogreene@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next] intel: add SPDX identifiers to all the Intel drivers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Jeff Kirsher
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 10:52 AM
> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>; davem@...emloft.net; Philippe
> Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; nhorman@...hat.com; sassmann@...hat.com;
> jogreene@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [net-next] intel: add SPDX identifiers to all the Intel drivers
> 
> On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 10:41 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 10:13 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > Add the SPDX identifiers to all the Intel wired LAN driver files,
> > > as
> > > outlined in Documentation/process/license-rules.rst.
> >
> > So far the Documentation does not show using the -only variant.
> >
> > For a discussion, please see:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/8/311

But the Linux Foundation, the authority maintaining the valid SPDX identifiers, indicates at https://spdx.org/licenses/ that "GPL-2.0" is deprecated while "GPL-2.0-only" (and others) is appropriate.
Was there any mention in the thread or other conversations if/when the kernel's documentation (and all existing uses of "GPL-2.0" in the kernel) will be updated to "GPL-2.0-only"?

> 
> :-( I had it originally as GPL-2.0 and then it was pointed out that it
> was being deprecated, so rather than creating future thrash over the
> change, figured I would be ahead of the game.
> 
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
> >
> > []
> > > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >
> > etc...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ