lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 23:55:33 +0100 From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>, Chenbo Feng <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>, Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: skip unnecessary capability check On 03/20/2018 12:37 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:57 AM, Chenbo Feng > <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com> wrote: >> - if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled) >> + if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) >> return -EPERM; >> > > Acked-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com> > > Should this be targeted to bpf (or even -stable) instead of bpf-next? Ok, I've applied to bpf tree, thanks guys!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists