netdev - [PATCH net 3/4] s390/qeth: lock read device while queueing next buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180320065915.62076-4-jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 07:59:14 +0100
From:   Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 3/4] s390/qeth: lock read device while queueing next buffer

For calling ccw_device_start(), issue_next_read() needs to hold the
device's ccwlock.
This is satisfied for the IRQ handler path (where qeth_irq() gets called
under the ccwlock), but we need explicit locking for the initial call by
the MPC initialization.

Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
index 42ee8806fa53..2a9afaf8f264 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -527,8 +527,7 @@ static inline int qeth_is_cq(struct qeth_card *card, unsigned int queue)
 	    queue == card->qdio.no_in_queues - 1;
 }
 
-
-static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
+static int __qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
 {
 	int rc;
 	struct qeth_cmd_buffer *iob;
@@ -559,6 +558,17 @@ static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
 	return rc;
 }
 
+static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	spin_lock_irq(get_ccwdev_lock(CARD_RDEV(card)));
+	ret = __qeth_issue_next_read(card);
+	spin_unlock_irq(get_ccwdev_lock(CARD_RDEV(card)));
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static struct qeth_reply *qeth_alloc_reply(struct qeth_card *card)
 {
 	struct qeth_reply *reply;
@@ -1182,7 +1192,7 @@ static void qeth_irq(struct ccw_device *cdev, unsigned long intparm,
 		return;
 	if (channel == &card->read &&
 	    channel->state == CH_STATE_UP)
-		qeth_issue_next_read(card);
+		__qeth_issue_next_read(card);
 
 	iob = channel->iob;
 	index = channel->buf_no;
-- 
2.13.5