lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c78c0c21-e161-f8c3-afc6-04b9888647ee@fb.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:02:25 -0700
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
CC:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <diptanu@...com>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag
 frag_list skb



On 3/21/18 2:51 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
>> One of our in-house projects, bpf-based NAT, hits a kernel BUG_ON at
>> function skb_segment(), line 3667. The bpf program attaches to
>> clsact ingress, calls bpf_skb_change_proto to change protocol
>> from ipv4 to ipv6 or from ipv6 to ipv4, and then calls bpf_redirect
>> to send the changed packet out.
>>
>> 3472 struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
>> 3473                             netdev_features_t features)
>> 3474 {
>> 3475         struct sk_buff *segs = NULL;
>> 3476         struct sk_buff *tail = NULL;
>> ...
>> 3665                 while (pos < offset + len) {
>> 3666                         if (i >= nfrags) {
>> 3667                                 BUG_ON(skb_headlen(list_skb));
>> 3668
>> 3669                                 i = 0;
>> 3670                                 nfrags = skb_shinfo(list_skb)->nr_frags;
>> 3671                                 frag = skb_shinfo(list_skb)->frags;
>> 3672                                 frag_skb = list_skb;
>> ...
>>
>> call stack:
>> ...
>>   #1 [ffff883ffef03558] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8110c525
>>   #2 [ffff883ffef03620] crash_kexec at ffffffff8110d5cc
>>   #3 [ffff883ffef03640] oops_end at ffffffff8101d7e7
>>   #4 [ffff883ffef03668] die at ffffffff8101deb2
>>   #5 [ffff883ffef03698] do_trap at ffffffff8101a700
>>   #6 [ffff883ffef036e8] do_error_trap at ffffffff8101abfe
>>   #7 [ffff883ffef037a0] do_invalid_op at ffffffff8101acd0
>>   #8 [ffff883ffef037b0] invalid_op at ffffffff81a00bab
>>      [exception RIP: skb_segment+3044]
>>      RIP: ffffffff817e4dd4  RSP: ffff883ffef03860  RFLAGS: 00010216
>>      RAX: 0000000000002bf6  RBX: ffff883feb7aaa00  RCX: 0000000000000011
>>      RDX: ffff883fb87910c0  RSI: 0000000000000011  RDI: ffff883feb7ab500
>>      RBP: ffff883ffef03928   R8: 0000000000002ce2   R9: 00000000000027da
>>      R10: 000001ea00000000  R11: 0000000000002d82  R12: ffff883f90a1ee80
>>      R13: ffff883fb8791120  R14: ffff883feb7abc00  R15: 0000000000002ce2
>>      ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
>>   #9 [ffff883ffef03930] tcp_gso_segment at ffffffff818713e7
>> --- <IRQ stack> ---
>> ...
>>
>> The triggering input skb has the following properties:
>>      list_skb = skb->frag_list;
>>      skb->nfrags != NULL && skb_headlen(list_skb) != 0
>> and skb_segment() is not able to handle a frag_list skb
>> if its headlen (list_skb->len - list_skb->data_len) is not 0.
>>
>> This patch addressed the issue by handling skb_headlen(list_skb) != 0
>> case properly if list_skb->head_frag is true, which is expected in
>> most cases. The head frag is processed before list_skb->frags
>> are processed.
>>
>> Reported-by: Diptanu Gon Choudhury <diptanu@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
>> ---
>>   net/core/skbuff.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> index 715c134..23b317a 100644
>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> @@ -3460,6 +3460,19 @@ void *skb_pull_rcsum(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_pull_rcsum);
>>
>> +static inline skb_frag_t skb_head_frag_to_page_desc(struct sk_buff *frag_skb)
>> +{
>> +       skb_frag_t head_frag;
>> +       struct page *page;
>> +
>> +       page = virt_to_head_page(frag_skb->head);
>> +       head_frag.page.p = page;
>> +       head_frag.page_offset = frag_skb->data -
>> +               (unsigned char *)page_address(page);
>> +       head_frag.size = skb_headlen(frag_skb);
>> +       return head_frag;
>> +}
>> +
>>   /**
>>    *     skb_segment - Perform protocol segmentation on skb.
>>    *     @head_skb: buffer to segment
>> @@ -3664,15 +3677,16 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
>>
>>                  while (pos < offset + len) {
>>                          if (i >= nfrags) {
>> -                               BUG_ON(skb_headlen(list_skb));
>> -
>>                                  i = 0;
>>                                  nfrags = skb_shinfo(list_skb)->nr_frags;
>>                                  frag = skb_shinfo(list_skb)->frags;
>> -                               frag_skb = list_skb;
> 
> You could probably leave this line in place. No point in moving it.

The only reason I moved it is to make define more close to the use.
But I am totally fine with leaving it as it.

> 
>> -
>> -                               BUG_ON(!nfrags);
>> +                               if (skb_headlen(list_skb)) {
>> +                                       BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag);
>>
>> +                                       /* to make room for head_frag. */
>> +                                       i--; frag--;
> 
> Normally these should be two separate lines one for "i--;" and one for
> "frag--;".

Will change. Surprised that checkpatch.pl did not complain about this.

> 
>> +                               }
> 
> You could probably place the BUG_ON(!nfrags) in an else statement here
> to handle the case where we have a potentially empty skb which would
> be a bug.

Yes, this makes sense. Will add this BUG_ON.
> 
>> +                               frag_skb = list_skb;
>>                                  if (skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC) ||
>>                                      skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb,
>>                                                         GFP_ATOMIC))
>> @@ -3689,7 +3703,7 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
>>                                  goto err;
>>                          }
>>
>> -                       *nskb_frag = *frag;
>> +                       *nskb_frag = (i < 0) ? skb_head_frag_to_page_desc(frag_skb) : *frag;
>>                          __skb_frag_ref(nskb_frag);
>>                          size = skb_frag_size(nskb_frag);
>>
>> --
>> 2.9.5
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ