netdev - Re: [net-next] intel: add SPDX identifiers to all the Intel drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 17:47:18 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com,
        sassmann@...hat.com, jogreene@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next] intel: add SPDX identifiers to all the Intel drivers

On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:13:20 -0700
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
> index 29486478836e..a750a5fe373a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  /*******************************************************************************
>  
>    Intel PRO/100 Linux driver

SPDX makes things easier but I thought the advantage of SPDX
was getting rid of the boilerplate! Can you convince the lawyers
to drop the GPL boilerplate comment please.

It has already been done on other projects.